ELECTRIC POWER
Motor Calc Program - find which motor, battery and prop is right for your EP airplane
Multiplex 2007 Catalogue in English
50-75 watts per lb - for trainers and
slow flyer.
75-125 watts per lb - great for sport/aerobatic flying.
150+ watts per lb - great for 3D and vertical
flying.
Brushless motors come in 2 different varieties: "Inrunner" and
"Outrunner."
An inrunner is your standard motor shape/design. Usually in the higher
kv rating of 2000-10000kv used with gearboxes for increased torque
output.
Anything over ~5000kv is generally too fast / low torque for plane use
and used mainly in ridiculously fast 1/18th scale cars and trucks with
gear reduction of course.
"Outrunners" are higher torque/low kv motors, anywhere from 200 (big
BIG power) - 2500 kv (ducted fan/high speed plane), and don't really
use gearboxes (sometimes 2:1 reduction or similar for higher kv motors).
To make it easier to figure out your needs, some BRUSHLESS motor
companies use the motor "Speed size" designation in the labels to help
pick out your motor, such as the E-Flite Brushless motor series; Park
370 (in- and Outrunner), Park 480 Outrunner, though compared to their
brushed motor counterparts these motors are well over powered (and
goodly so). Then you have their larger motors named like so: Power 10,
Power 25, which means they are about the same as a .10 sized, or .25
sized nitro/gas engine respectively.
To further complicate things, many companies name their Brushless
motors according to their physical size, as in rotor or can/bell
diameter/length, kv rating, # of stator poles (don't ask I'm no expert
either) in Outrunner type motors.
But you are pretty smart it seems You already know the Kv rating under
load means nothing (well it still is useful) and that watts is usually
what you want, as I listed above. However, the lower Kv motors are good
for larger props direct drive, and higher kv motors are good for
smaller direct drive props, or use gearbox for larger ones. Also,
voltage from the battery drops under load, too. Nimh/nicad batteries
are worse at voltage drop under load than Lithium Polymers in that
respect.
Also you want to keep amps down and volts up with your setup, in order
to reduce heat and stress on the power system you use.
Work out your watts, then find a matching motor for your application,
an ESC (electronic speed controller) that can handle the amp draw and
voltage of your motor, battery that can deliver the calculated
voltage/amp draw (very important), then figure out which prop works
with your setup, i.e. if you have a sport plane, you want higher speeds
and thus higher kv motors with smaller props, while for 3D or slow
flyers, you want low kv with larger props for more thrust instead of
speed. Though not always, as you'll see.
As you may know: Watts = Amps x Voltage.
E.g. you have a 1.5lb (24oz) ready to fly weight, sport plane. You want
say 100w /lb for decent sport performance, probably a smaller higher
pitch prop.
So 1.5lb x 100watts = 150 watts total power. Ok. Let’s see. The E-Flite
Park 450 Brushless Outrunner (890 kv, by the way) direct drive, is
rated for about 150-175 max watts @ 14 amps constant current, using a
11.1v 3-cell lithium pack. Since it is Brushless you can afford to fall
short a few watts and not have any problems (better efficiency). 11.1v
x 14 amps = 155.4 watts. Oh, and you'll want a prop that can put the
right amount of load on the system and yet harness the power. I am
guessing from my past experience, an APC 9" x 7.5 E prop will do just
fine. (just in case, the 7.5" is the pitch of the prop). I recall good
strong climbouts, nice top speed. ...And then the crash..... long
story.
Now you'd want to make sure your lithium battery can handle the amps
comfortably. So you look up, (off the top of my head) a Thunder Power
3-cell 11.1v 1320 mah 12C (someone correct me) battery . The 12C means
it can provide a constant amp draw of 12 x it's capacity = 1.320 amps x
12 = ~15-16 amps.
BTW, I think it's a good idea for your own safety/accuracy
that you
use a power meter of some sort, like the Astro Watts Up meter, or
E-flite's Power Meter so you can measure the amp draw/watts of your
system so you don't over amp any part of your equipment.
Whatever I've missed someone else can assuredly step in and add!
I was in your shoes earlier this year. Practice and experience have brought me so far, and LOTS of MONEY (which I don't have). And of course, this very helpful forum! Thanks Al Gore for making the internet!
Ok bad joke.
Hope you found my thoroughly boring lesson somewhat helpful.
POWER = WATTS
I will be using the terms Volts, Amps and Watts throughout this
discussion.
Let me define them.
Volts = the pressure at which the electric energy is being delivered -
like pounds per square inch or PSI in a fuel system or water from a
garden hose.
Volts is about pressure, it says nothing about flow. You will see volts
abbreviated as V.
Amps = the quantity or flow of electricity being delivered, like
gallons per minute in a fuel system or that same garden hose. Amps is
about flow, it says nothing about pressure. You will see amps
abbreviated as A.
Watts = V X A. This is a measure of the energy or power being
delivered. This is how we measure the ability of that electricity to do
work, in our case the work of turning a propeller to move our airplane
through the air.
Watts is about both pressure and flow. This serves the same purpose as
the horsepower rating of your car's engine. In fact 746 watts = 1
horsepower. So if you had an electric car, the strength of its motor
could be reported in either watts or horsepower. You will see watts
abbreviated as W.
If you want more depth on this, visit this thread.
http://www.wattflyer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1933
MOTOR EFFICIENCY - Brushed vs Brushless
http://www.davison03.110mb.com/Peterlee%20Index.html
Whether brushed or Brushless, the motor's job is to convert electricity
into mechanical motion to turn the propeller to move air. Efficiency is
how we measure how much of the power, the watts, that our battery
delivers to the motor is actually turned into useful work and how much
is wasted as heat. A higher efficiency motor delivers more energy to
the motor, and wastes less.
A typical brushed motor, say a speed 400, is only about 40-50%
efficient. Only about half the watts delivered to the motor actually
end up as useful work turning the propeller. The rest is wasted. Motors
that have a "speed" designation, like speed 400, are brushed motors.
There are other names for brushed motors but the "speed" term is a
common one. They are inexpensive and they work. For example, you can
buy a speed 400 motor and electronic speed control, ESC, for $35. A
comparable Brushless motor/ESC combination would typically cost 3 to 4
times that much.
Brushless motors tend to be more efficient. They typically deliver
70-90% of that input power to the propeller, Thus you get better
performance per watt with Brushless motors. Seen a different way, if
you use abrushless motor
, then, for the same flying performance you will use less energy which
means your battery will last longer. Or you can use a similar size and
weight Brushless motor and get much higher performance because the
motor turns more of the watts from the battery into useful work of
turning the propeller.
So, as with many decisions we make, this is a cost benefit decision. Am
I willing to pay more to get more? That is up to you.
THE BATTERY IS MORE THAN JUST THE FUEL TANK
Think of the battery as the fuel tank plus the fuel pump and a
supercharger all rolled into one. It feeds/pushes energy to the motor.
So you have to look at the battery and the motor as one unit when you
are sizing power systems for electric planes. In many cases we start
with the battery when we size our systems because the motor can't
deliver the power to the prop if the battery can't deliver the power to
the motor.
The higher the voltage rating of the battery, the higher the pressure,
like a supercharger on a car engine. More pressure delivers more
air/fuel mixture to the engine, which allows the engine to produce more
power to turn the wheels of the car. Higher voltage pushes more
electricity into the motor to produce more power.
Using our electric motors, a given motor may take 10 amps ( the
quantity of electricity flowing ) at 8.4 volts ( the pressure at which
the electricity is being delivered) to spin a certain propeller. We
would say that the battery is delivering, or that the motor is drawing
84 watts, ie: 8.4V x 10A. If you bump up the voltage to 9.6 volts, the
battery can ram in more amps delivering more energy to the motor, which
will produce more power to the propeller. In this example, if we move
from an 8.4V battery pack to a 9.6V battery pack the motor may now take
12 amps. This will typically spin the motor faster with any given
propeller or allow it to turn a larger propeller at the same speed.
However, if you bump up the pressure too much, you can break something.
Putting a big supercharger on an engine that is not designed for it
will break parts of the engine. Too much voltage can over power your
electric motor and damage it. So there is a balance that has to be
struck. Different motors can take different amounts of power, watts,
volts X amps, without damage. For example, a speed 400 motor might be
fine taking 10 amps at 9.6 volts or 96 watts. However a speed 280 motor
will have a short life with the same combination of volts and amps.
If you match the right battery with the right motor, you get good
performance without damage to the motor. In many cases airplane
designers will design planes around a specific motor battery
combination so that they match the size and weight of the plane to the
power system for good performance.
PROPELLERS
Propellers are sized by diameter and pitch.
The diameter of the propeller determines the volume of air the
propeller will move, producing thrust, or pushing force. Roughly
speaking the diameter of the propeller will have the biggest impact on
the size and weight of the plane that we can fly. Larger, heavier
planes will typically fly better with larger diameter propellers.
Pitch refers to the angle of the propeller blade and refers to the
distance the propeller would move forward if there were no slippage in
the air. So a 7-inch pitch propeller would move forward 7 inches per
rotation, if there were no slippage in the air. If we combine pitch
with the rotational speed of the propeller we can calculate the pitch
"speed" of the propeller. So, at 10000 revolutions per minute, that
prop would move 7000 inches forward 70,000 inches per minute. If we do
the math, that comes out to a little over 66 miles per hour.
By changing the diameter and the pitch of the propeller we can have a
similar effect to changing the gears in your car or a bicycle. It will
be harder for your motor to turn a 9X7 propeller than an 8X7 propeller.
And it would be harder to turn a 9X7 propeller than a 9X6 propeller.
The larger, steeper pitched propellers will require more energy, more
watts, more horsepower, to turn them. Therefore we need to balance the
diameter and pitch with the power or wattage of the motor/battery
system. Fortunately we don't actually have to do this as motor
manufacturers will often publish suggested propellers to use with a
given motor/battery combination. We can use these as our starting
point. If we want we can try different propellers that are near these
specifications to see how they work with our airplane.
NOW WE CAN START TO MATCH UP THE PIECES!
The simplest approach I have seen to figuring power systems in
electrics is input watts per pound of "all up" airplane weight. The
following guidelines were developed before Brushless motors were common
but it seems to hold pretty well so we will use it regardless of what
kind of motor is being used.
50 watts per pound = Casual/scale flying
75 watts per pound = Sport flying and sport aerobatics
100 watts per pound = aggressive aerobatics and mild 3D
150 watts per pound = all out performance.
Remember that Watts = Volts X Amps. This is a power measurement.
In case you were wondering, 746 watts equals 1 horsepower.
AN EXAMPLE!
This should be fun. Let's see where these formulas take us! We will use
a 24-ounce, 1.5 pound plane as our example. If we want basic flight you
will need 50 watts per pound or about 75 watts input to your motor for
this 1.5 pound plane. That is, 50 watts per pound X 1.5 pounds = 75
watts needed for basic flying performance. If you want a little more
spirited plane, we could use 75 watts X 1.5 pounds which is about 112.5
watts.
Let’s use 100 watts as the total target, just to be simple, shall we? I
am going to use a lot of round numbers here. I hope you can follow.
The Battery:
If we use an 8 cell NiMh battery pack at 9.6 V it will have to deliver
10.4 amps to hit our 100 watts input target ( 100/9.6 = 10.41amps) If
my battery pack cells are NiMh cells that are rated at 10C then I need
an 8 cell pack rated at 1100 mah to be able to deliver 11 amps. Sounds
about right.
Now I select a motor that can handle 100 watts or about 10.4 amps at
9.6 Volts. From experience we know this could be a speed 400, a speed
480 or some kind of a Brushless motor.
We now need a propeller that will cause the motor to draw about 100
watts. I don't know off the top of my head what that would be. I would
go to some mfg chart - GWS has good charts!
I see that if I use a direct drive speed 400 with a 5X4.3 prop at 9.6V
then the motor will draw about 12.4 amps or about 119 watts. This would
be a good candidate motor/prop for the plane using a 9.6V pack that can
put out 12.4 or more amps. This would be a set-up for a fast plane as
that motor will spin that small prop very fast.
However maybe I don't want such a fast plane but one with a really good
climb and lots of low end pull to help out a new pilot who is in
training.
I can also use a speed 400 with a 2.38 gearbox and run it at 9.6V
spinning a 9X7 prop and run at about 12.8 amps for 120 watts. The
larger prop will give this plane a strong climb, but since the prop
speed has been reduced by 2.38 times, it won't be as fast. Spinning a
bigger prop gives me more thrust but a lower top speed typically.
Back to battery packs and motors
So if I shop for a 9.6V pack to be able to handle about 15-20 amps, I
should do just fine and not over stress the batteries. In NiMh that
would probably be a 2/3 or 4/5 A pack of about 1100 -1500 mah capacity,
depending on the quality of the cells.
We view the battery and motor as a linked unit with a target power
profile, in this case about 100 watts. We use the prop and gearbox, if
any, to produce the manner in which we want to deliver that power to
the air to pull/push the plane.
If this is a pusher, I may not have clearance to spin that big prop so
I have to go for the smaller but faster prop combo.
If this is a puller, then I can choose my prop by ground clearance or
some other criteria and match a gearbox to it.
See, that was easy, right? But we are not done! Oh no!
I could try to do it with a 2-cell lithium pack rated 7.4V. To get 100
watts I now need a pack that can deliver 13.5 amps and a motor/prop
combination that will draw that much. So if I have 10 C rated lithiums,
then the pack better be at least 1350 mah. Probably use a 1500 mah pack
to be safe.
Well, when I look at the chart for the geared speed 400 I see that,
regardless of prop, at 7.4V I am not going to have enough voltage (
pressure) to push 13 amps into this motor. So the 2 cell lithium won't
meet my performance
goal of 100 watts + per pound using this gearbox.
If I go back to the charts and look at a different gearboxes I can't
hit my power goals using 7.4V. Maybe we go back to direct drive.
We see that the best I can get this speed 400 to do is a total of 70
watts at 7.2V ( close enough ) so I can't hit my power goals using a
speed 400 at this voltage. but 70 watts would be about 48 watts per
pound so I could have a flyable plane, but not an aerobatic plane using
this two-cell pack.
The assembly was pretty basic and very enjoyable. My setup is
Airtronics 94091Z Super Micro Servos, 92515Z Micro 5 Ch Receiver
(although I would recommend a *full* range Receiver such as the Hitec
05S. It seems to be popular on the forums) and one 96334Z Super Micro
Speed Control. I have a VG6000 Airtronics receiver and my charger is a
Hobbico Quick Field DC Charger MKII 12 Volt. I really love the computer
radio. Very easy to reprogram servos if they are reversed even for a
rookie like me.
I bought all of my stuff from Tower Hobbies. A word of caution, don't
listen to them on the battery pack for this plane. I wasted my money on
a 7 cell 650AAA. It does not have enough power to fly the EZ. MY 7 cell
1100 mah and 8 cell 1800 mah work great. I also ordered the Multiplex
ESC 400 Round 12A 400 Motor ESC and installed it in the beginning but
it requires wiring changes when going from the 7 to 8 cell battery so I
took it out and I installed the 96334Z Super Micro Speed Control that
came with my VG6000 radio.
Well, let me know how it goes. I gotta go for now. The wind is perfect
and I've got the bug! Good luck.